Lightroom is most certainly better now than it was; I don't think anyone is denying there here. But the fact remains it's still very poor compared to other RAW developers such as those listed in the original post.
The article you posted has no bearing on this post - it's simply saying Adobe improved RAW support, which they did. Their original support was frankly terrible. The author is not comparing the quality of the output against any other developer, which is the point of this thread.
Has Adobe improved RAW support for X-Trans? Yes.
Is it as good as the competition? No.
Is this satisfactory? No.
You mentioned you do not have a Fuji camera, so don't really understand why you are posting rebuttals of the facts presented to you by someone who does, day in, day out.
All of my colleagues and peers have left Adobe for one of the other developers above; I can assure you they do not do this without considerable reason.